Quantcast trebaker « Young Black Professional Guide

Recent Posts from trebaker

by Demetrius Walker

I voted for Barack Obama but I am not a Democrat. Before you get your hopes up Michael Steele, let me say that I also do not agree with the Republican party platform. So if I don’t fit into either of those two injudicious boxes, where do I fall you ask? Well, I side with the greatest mind of the 20th century, Albert Einstein, in feeling that “we shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive.” Call me a radical. Call me a dreamer. Call me whatever derogatory political name you can think of as long as you also call me a Socialtarian.

I know what you’re thinking now – what the heck is a Socialtarian? The truth is, I made up the term after realizing I equally subscribe to Socialism and many Libertarian ideals. Before you capitalist pigs and liberal lilies accuse me of being oxymoronic, take a second to think outside the box for once. Actually, to make things easier for you, let’s start inside your boxes.

Campaign Cover...
Creative Commons License credit: MotherPie
Socialtarian: Neither Democrat or Republican

First, Republicans, you guys supposedly stand for small government, fiscal responsibility, high moral standards, and deregulation of the economy. Under the Bush Administration, the federal government ballooned and became a more pervasive presence in the everyday life of Americans. “Freedom and liberty” was extended to Iraq, while I lost the right to have an untapped phone conversation at home. Even more, we squandered a couple trillion dollars in our attempt to “liberate” Iraq and “organize” Afghanistan. As far as moral standards are concerned, I’ve lost track of how many Republican public officials were tied up in corruption, sex, and crime scandals in the past few years (to be fair, I can say the same for Democrats, but this is not a cornerstone of their platform).

Those Republicans I find most intriguing are the purportedly “Conservative” members of the party. Basing your belief system on “Christian” standards, you paradoxically subscribe to inequality, intolerance, and greed. I remember debating with many of you when Joe The Plumber exposed Barack Obama’s tax plan as “socialist.” You guys threw a temper tantrum and completely lost your bearings! The very same Republicans that argued that the foundations of American law should be more reflective of the Bible, were the same people that acknowledged that there should be no spreading of the wealth; there should be no universal healthcare; their tax dollars should not fund the rebuilding of better schools in neighborhoods they don’t live in. Well why don’t we check what the Bible says? Turn to 1 Corinthians 12:24-26. Are you ready?

“… God has combined the members of the body and has given greater honor to the parts that lacked it, [25] so that there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. [26] If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it.”

Don’t get me started on the countless other verses I could quote that undoubtedly prove the Bible is actually a socialistic doctrine. So how can you “evangelical/morally conservative” Republicans sleep in peace knowing that you actually do not wish to see social equality? I’ve never understood how you could wholeheartedly agree with the Bible, yet refuse to subscribe to the belief that at least some portion of the country’s wealth should be divided to eliminate poverty, grant universal healthcare, and promote a better education system for children in ALL communities. It baffles me how you can quote Jesus in one breath and then tell me you don’t care about the greater welfare of your fellow citizens in the next breath. I’ve even had conversations with many of you that seem to believe poor people are only poor because they chose not to work hard; you are completely ignorant to the socio economic factors that facilitate the perpetual cycle of poverty in the US and abroad. The main factor is your GREED; your unwillingness to share for the greater benefit of the entire group. Only after starting out with an equal chance at success, would it be fair to acknowledge that a person’s ultimate failures or triumphs were completely self induced.

On to the Democrats. You guys don’t seem to have as much of a problem tossing money around. You also claim to be proponents of equal rights. But tossing money around willy nilly, and promoting a class of citizens dependent upon degrading welfare systems is not what I envision as conducive to a greater America. Don’t give hungry people a fish and tell them to eat merrily; teach the people to fish so that they may feed themselves and others! This starts with education. Don’t blow our tax dollars on public housing facilities and benefit programs for lazy, uneducated people that will only pass down more ignorance to their offspring. Create a universal standard for public education and public school facilities starting at Kindergarten. Bailout our failing education system, not the corporations that will continue to erode our ethics, and deplete our financial resources.

In the area of equal rights, Democrats are all talk. Look at the issue of gay marriage for example. Whatever your religious affiliation, there is nothing in the Constitution that denies gay people the fundamental right to marry. Yet, many top Democrats, including our 44th President, stand firmly in ignorance with the Right Wing when it comes to preventing gays from marriage. I am a Christian, I go to Bible Study every Wednesday and church every Sunday. But even I can see that the doctrine which governs the United States is the Constitution, not the Bible. Why should I care whether two men or two women want to marry each other anyway? As a straight male, this does not make dating more competitive for me. It actually makes it easier, as those lesbians I might have hit on can more easily display that they’re off limits. Are most Americans worried that the country will become somehow gayer if we allow homosexuals to marry? Do you think that if we prevent them from marrying that they’ll eventually go away? This is ludicrous!

This brings me to why I consider myself a Socialtarian. I side with the Bible in believing that it is our job to collectively support one another. I also believe in the inalienable rights of man – Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Anything that prevents these principles from manifesting is unjust and wasteful. In our current state, capitalism unfairly lumps a large chunk of wealth into the hands of a tiny segment of our population. This fosters the poverty, crime, and desperation that generates 90 percent of the world’s problems. In the words of Einstein,

“the economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil. We see before us a huge community of producers, the members of which are unceasingly striving to deprive each other of the fruits of their collective labor — not by force, but on the whole in faithful compliance with legally established rules (Why Socialism by Albert Einstein).”

If we were to distribute the country’s finances in a socialistic manner that specifically focused on the promotion of equal education, then poverty, crime, and other socioeconomic factors would cease to exist.

This where I draw the line. I do not wish to see a federal government that confiscates every dollar earned, nor one that strives to eliminate a difference in income between dish washers and brain surgeons. I merely wish to see the United States become a place where every child is born with a perfectly equal shot at success and the attainment of wealth. Every man is guaranteed life, which correlates to the preservation of existence, a right only secured through universal healthcare. Each man is also ensured liberty in this country. Therefore, I side with the Libertarian party’s call “for a world in which all individuals can freely exercise the natural right of sole dominion over their own lives.” Outside of making sure every citizen starts on equal ground, I do not need the federal or state government to be my third parent. For example, I should not be subject to incarceration for using drugs. If a person wants to damage their own body and it doesn’t affect others then let them be. If crack was legal, would you go out and smoke some today? I highly doubt it, so why the need for such foolish laws? All I demand the government to do is collect funds and apply them directly to the elimination of poverty, education and health disparities so that I may pursue my happiness… then get the hell out of the way. So take note you foxes and wolves, a ferocious beast is on the prowl for you – the Socialtarian.

by Justin Giboney

Make an objective appraisal of the following statistics because they form the basis of an inconvenient truth that I would like black America to consider:

  • A study conducted by criminologists at Northeastern University found that since 2000, while overall murder rates nationwide have fallen, the murder rate among black youth is on the rise.
  • Homicide is the leading cause of death for black males between the ages of 15 and 29.
  • 94% of blacks murdered are murdered by other blacks.
  • According to the Associated Press, in 2008, more citizens were murdered in Chicago (city with one of the highest black population in America) than American soldiers killed in Iraq.

While external threats to a nation are always a serious concern, more often than not, internal threats present a more immediate and grave danger (see War on Terror). What’s more, sabotage within cripples a people’s ability to fight without. For some time, I have struggled with whether or not many of the more problematic issues in the black community are a microcosm of that same science. Is it possible that at this moment in history, black America’s most mortal enemy is within?

The Tuskegee Experiment
The Tuskegee Experiment

From the Tuskegee Experiment to Cointelpro, black America’s had good reason to be suspicious of the intent and effect of external forces. To suggest such indignities should simply be forgotten is neither useful nor realistic.  In the same breath, these wrongs should not and cannot be used as an eternal crutch. Unfortunately, the vestiges of such cruelness still haunt the psyches of many African-Americans and render us hyper-cynical and prone to entertaining the most far out conspiracy theories. Cynicism can warp reality.

The barbershop has long served as a daily forum for male discourse. There is no better place to gauge the black male sentiment on a variety of topics.  However, you will quickly find that these conversations often unveil a deep-seated cynicism. Enter any black barbershop from Tuesday through Saturday and you are guaranteed to hear spirited debates, along with a few outlandish conspiracy theories.  You might even hear a story about how the American government is using iPods and ESPN to exterminate the black community.  I have heard theories that are so creative, they make a Dan Brown novel seem pedestrian.  It is entertaining at times, but disheartening once you realize that some of us actually use such theories to shun responsibility and feed a sense of helplessness and defeatism.

Notwithstanding the atrocities of the past or the inequities of the present, self-responsibility must kick in at some point. As incompetent and irresponsible as the W. Bush administration may have seemed, they were not the cause of all the black community’s problems.  Violent crime is one of the most pressing concerns in the black community and we would be sadly remiss if we failed to take the majority of the responsibility in this issue.

BE047455
Creative Commons License credit: seccad
Are We Too Apologetic?

For every Sean Bell and Oscar Grant (R.I.P.), there are several hundred blacks killed at the hands of other blacks (not in uniform). Where is the outrage and protest? Our youth are being intimidated and  corrupted and our elderly are afraid to step out their doors. Why do we make excuses for the individuals who terrorize our community on a daily basis? Perhaps it is because they are our sons, brothers, nephews, and cousins.  We must fight the denial that prevents us from seeing the blood dripping from our collective hand.

Most apologists suggest these perpetrators are somehow absolved because of historical mistreatment and poor backgrounds. In my opinion, those factors do not justify terrorizing your community. A significant number of  blacks have always suffered from relatively low socio-economic statuses; however, poor living conditions have never been an excuse for such poor behavior. Moreover, there are several third world countries with significantly lower murder rates, so poverty in itself cannot be a justification.

These apologists also work off the misconception that the great majority of the young brothers committing these crimes are poverty stricken. On the contrary, I venture to say that a good number of these brothers did not grow up like Jermaine and Dukie in The Wire. There is a pervasive thug and anti-intellectualism mentality in our community that transcends economic lines further than we would like to admit.

Take an honest assessment of the violence plaguing the black community.  Can we honestly contend that it does not stem from internal sources?  Can we in good faith pawn yet another community issue off on “The Man”?  Undoubtedly, we can put a dent in the senseless violence in our community, but the first step is acknowledging the enemy within.

by Tre B
Equality in a society based on one group dominating all others is a revolutionary concept.  MLK was a revolutionary.

Don’t get it twisted, despite the watered-down, docile version of the man they show you on TV and in tributes around this time of year, MLK was really a revolutionary.  The reason he’s not with us today is because those revolutionary tendencies were showing through with more force in regard to the war in Vietnam and the economic empowerment of poor people in this nation.  He was truly a dangerous Negro, a Black man that defied that status quo and couldn’t be controlled, like some of his contemporaries that are still with us today.

Martin Luther King Mural at Elijah Stroud School
Creative Commons License credit: brooklyntheborough
MLK was a Revolutionary

The media likes to portray this religious-based, non-violent movement lead by the Civil Rights leaders of the day, but they don’t tell you the true ramifications of MLK’s movement and how dangerous it really was to the white businessmen that controlled (and still control) this country.  Why was this non-violent movement so powerful?  Why were sit-ins so effective?  Non-violence may have been justified with scriptures from the Bible, but there were actually very practical reasons for this strategy:

  1. We were in no position to go up against the government’s military might.  Don’t fight a battle you can’t win. Not resorting to violence gave us the moral advantage which is effective in getting PR and support from possible domestic and international allies.  In a supposedly Christian nation “under God,” it’s hard not to see something wrong with armed men physically abusing unarmed women and children.  It also showed how dishonorable and cowardly the police were, which is an embarrassment to national pride.
  2. Sit-ins were more than just a mere annoyance for white business owners.  It messed with their cash flow, and we know how these people get when you mess with their money.  The reason these tactics don’t work anymore is because they’re old and played out and the leaders that use them either don’t know the purpose behind them or don’t really care.  You have to find new and more disruptive ways to make a negative financial impact against these racist companies that are alive and well today in 2009.  For example, go into a bank and fill up the lines with people opening up and closing bank account with the minimum deposit.  Open an account with $25 at 9:00, make small deposits/withdrawals at the counter every 30 minutes or so, and repeat step 2 every day for as long as the protest lasts.  Then at the end, close the account.  Or send a ton of people to a store to buy the cheapest thing they have and return it.  Anything to prevent real customers from patronizing the business for long periods of time is effective.

See, Dr. King was only getting started with achieving political/civil rights.  When they killed him, he was starting to focus more on economic empowerment and building international alliances with other poor brown countries (because that’s what Black America is in essence, having never really been accepted into the general population).  The American intelligence agencies know how powerful a unified Black population is, especially when they flex their economic muscles and they believe this could pose a national security risk (i.e. COINTELPRO).  Any Black man that was capable of leading this unified population was bought, coerced into submission, or killed.  Like Nas said:

No revolutionary gets old, or so I’m told.  You’re left full of bullet holes when you tell the people go free.

On this day of remembrance for Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., let us honor his name by remembering the man depicted by the mainstream media, but also the man they don’t show you; the one you have to read about on your own. Honor him by reading and learning why he was so dangerous that they decided to prematurely end his life. Learn, and teach the children, about the life of a revolutionary; not some socially acceptable, passive shadow of the man he really was.

by Malcolm G. Turner

Despite being more educated than our peers, well-spoken, non-threatening, generally good Negroes, Black folks tend to take the brunt of the damage during recessions, all the way from the janitors to the managers. The companies that are forced to comply with these equal opportunity standards are presented with the perfect opportunity to get a little vengeance during recessions when its easier to provide justification for firing large amounts of Black folk.

How can they get away with this you ask?

West End
Creative Commons License credit: Dan Thompson
Will your Economic Shop be Empty?

A Wall Street Journal quote from the 1990-91 recession sums it up nicely:

Affirmative action has gotten so diluted that companies can trade one minority against the other.

During that recession, Blacks were laid off at rates disproportionately higher than their white, Asian, and Hispanic counterparts. By allowing ourselves to be grouped in with all minorities, we have essentially forfeited our unique status as unwilling immigrants and senior claim to the debt owed to us from our free labor, military service, American apartheid, and taxation without representation.

Let’s put it this way. Black people for the past couple decades have been individually selfish and collectively generous.

It’s time to switch that around and start thinking as a nation within a nation. We fight for our collective rights and claims on the government and immediately share them with all so-called minorities (even white women). While quite noble, this is economic suicide. I’m not saying there are deliberate, high-level conspiracies to fire more African-Americans during a recession, but there are micro-level decisions influenced consciously or sub-consciously by racism specifically against Blacks more than other minorities that add up to large numbers of us being “right sized.” But we’ll see what the numbers say a couple years after this recession is over.

Meanwhile, we’re so busy celebrating one Afrikan-American man that broke the ultimate barrier, we have yet to discuss the inevitable backlash from white racists that have the ability to significantly affect our employment numbers (not mention our physical safety). You’re Black professionals right? So you know about re-orgs. It’s time to re-organize the YBP ranks and come up with a new corporate strategy. Some of us can remain as emissaries in these white corporations so they are reminded of our humanity on a daily basis and to make sure they don’t get too crazy with the discrimination and whatnot. But a gang of us need to get off the plantation. Why not just buy these companies that we complain about being racist all the time? Why not focus on ownership instead of employment; wealth instead of income? The car companies need money…well, Black folks in America spend a trillion dollars a year, mostly on stuff we don’t need that benefits other racial groups. We can afford a few billion to buy up some of these distressed companies.

I have a proposition. To make it easier, I’ll split YBP’s up into two categories: Toby and Kunta. Both are slaves obviously since they both work for white masters, but there are subtle differences. When Toby talks about his company he says “we” because he truly believes that his fate is that of his master and when his master is sick, he’s sick. On the other hand, Kunta says “they” or the name of the company because he’s just using the company for a paycheck until he can find the opportunity to run away. The higher your salary the more likely you are to be a Toby, almost by definition. Kunta just can’t spend every day for 10 years around these MF’s he can’t stand.

So my proposition is for the Kuntas out there. I have two tasks for you:

  1. By yourself or with a group of trusted, business-minded colleagues, write a business plan or two. One of them can be a business you’d start from scratch, but the other, more important one, should focus on buying an existing business. You don’t have to actually start the business(es) yet, just get yourself in the mindset of thinking about other options.
  2. Research Black-owned companies you wouldn’t mind working for that actually make it a point to have a majority Black employment base.

At the end of they day, capitalism is characterized by a competition for assets and resources in the pursuit of profits. Unfortunately, mankind has not evolved to the state where we do not separate ourselves based on ethnicity. Every other ethnicity operates as an economic cooperative with preference given to fellow ethnic members. Whereas, we’re still stuck in this mode of trying to crash everyone else’s party instead of getting together and controlling our own economic destiny. If there has ever been a time for an agenda of self-determination within the Afrikan community, it’s now while assets are cheap and governments are too weak to fight back with full force. Ethnocentricity is not necessarily a bad thing; it’s time we start practicing it in economically productive ways.

Finally, I’m currently enslaved on the plantation with a side hustle for extra income, but if anyone is thinking about starting a Black-owned and operated private equity company to take advantage of these low asset prices while providing jobs and building wealth in the Black community, holler at me. I might have a few good recruits for you.

Hotep

I’ve always been skeptical of people who tell you something and then expect you to just believe it without doing your own research. I was the kid who told my parents that Santa didn’t exist (instead of the other way around), and asked questions like, “Would Gandhi go to hell because he didn’t believe that Jesus is the son of God and died for our sins?” Having been raised in the conservative Church of Christ where I was expected to simply believe the teachings, I felt that it was my duty to do my own research and not blindly accept “on faith” what I was being taught. How can you truly believe something if you haven’t researched it and other options?

Cross 2
Creative Commons License credit: chb1848
Share Your Conversion Stories

I’m amazed at people who claim a certain religion and haven’t even critically examined and studied the primary source(s) of information for their beliefs (e.g. the Bible, Koran, Torah, Bagvadhgita, Vedas, etc.). At the end of the day I care more about what you do, not what you say you believe, because I think your truebeliefs will drive your actions.

More to the point, I’m still on my own spiritual journey and have just recently started to spend time seriously investigating other options besides the one that was shoved at me when I was young and impressionable. I was attempting to share some of my findings with someone very close to me, and they basically shut down. I mean, they were physically affected by the information. I was just sharing some information I thought was interesting, not trying to convert them or anything. I was amazed at how people have been brainwashed to the point that they are closed to even learning about anything else. I use the word “brainwashed” because if it was simply a matter of having faith, then this person would not have been affected in such a way by new, conflicting information. I realized that you can’t just spring stuff on people that basically refutes everything they’ve been taught to believe all at once. There’s a process for effectively sharing information regarding sensitive subjects like religion.

So I said all that to make this request: Do you have any inspirational conversion stories either about yourself or someone you know?

I’m specifically interested in hearing examples of people being raised in a certain religion who believed it without question and then converted (either to another religion or to a more spiritually pure path) after reaching adulthood. You can share by commenting on this post or emailing me directly at tre@dnbeapparel.com. To get the conversation started, here’s the most inspirational story I’ve read so far.

© Copyright Black Web Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.