Quantcast BET « Young Black Professional Guide

Posts Tagged ‘BET’

A follow-up to my first Blogging While Brown…About Science is in order.

Blogging While Brown

Thanks to the great comments made here and at Jack & Jill Politics, I realized that you all were absolutely right. I’ve got to push through the discomfort, create my own air for this issue. So here I am sounding off about scientific literacy and the African-American community.

Our community’s relationship with math and science is a rocky one. Many of us, both children and adults, are just averse to science and math. We avoid it. Too many of our students score poorly on state tests in these subjects and too few pursue science careers. Which leads me to wonder, how is science communicated to the African-American community, and what’s the best way to communicate science to this community?

The first thing I know is that the existing science communication vehicles have failed to effectively reach the entire general public. One setback is the declining state of science journalism in this nation. Newspapers, news radio, and television stations have drastically reduced or eliminated science news.

Science Editor Journal
Creative Commons License credit: moria
Are Science Magazines one-dimensional?

Second, popular science magazines tend to attract a readership that is primarily white, male, and middle-aged. Communities like African-Americans, immigrants, or economically disadvantaged groups are not being reached. In fact, these audiences are often described as “underserved”.

Why is that?

With successful media outlets that specifically target black audiences like Ebony Magazine, Black newspapers, Black America Web, BET, and nationally-syndicated radio programs, why hasn’t science news reporting been a regular feature? Why haven’t science communication professionals considered marketing science to specific audiences? Why is science so hard to sell to minority communities?

I think the internet may provide the best answers to these questions. As my science blogging friend Daniel, so eloquently states, science blogging is the future of science communication.

Blogs allow readers to interact directly with scientists and researchers. Blogs offer a rare look into the minds and labs of scientists and engineers at different career levels – student, post-doc, and professor. The immediacy of the internet allows quick dissemination of information about new discoveries and technologies that before were only shared among researchers.

Johnson Publishing, Michigan Ave
Creative Commons License credit: JOE M500
Where are #blck magazines in STEM?

As often as we use blogs to follow celebrities or politics or economic trends, we can also follow engineering breakthroughs, medical discoveries, and environmental issues. Blogging gives us the opportunity to initiate the conversation. Though Blacks comprise a smaller number of the PhDs in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) there are more of us than you may think. There is a growing number of science bloggers of color, too. (See the list at the end of the post). Science-related topics can be discussed in different ways – such as discussing the science behind controversial issues, commenting on health statistics, expounding on green technologies or profiling role models.

I believe that science can be communicated effectively to people if it is presented in a relevant manner. It’s time for the conversation to begin.

List of science blogs written by persons of color
Asymptotia *
49 Percent
Reconciliation Biology
Scientist Mother
The Urban Birder *
SES: Science, Education & Society *
Not Exactly Rocket Science
Thesis With Children *
Physics for Girls
Life’s A Lab! Science Chicago *
TechTechBoom
But You’re A Girl.com *
Chick With PhizzleDizzle
Diary of a PhD Student *
Science To Life *
Urban Science Adventures! © *
* persons who might be considered African-American or Black

Also check out the Diversity in Science blog carnival. Inspired by workshops about STEM diversity at the ScienceOnline09 Conference, bloggers of every genre contribute articles about various topics about achieving more diversity in science, engineering and math. It’s been a great outreach tool to communicate science to larger audiences. Check out our two editions so far, 1 and 2.

…um, boring.

On one hand, you have to give BET a soft golf clap on green lighting something that I feel like my peers and I have been discussing for years. The production and editing was clean and professional. The characters seemed genuine, at times. In the end, however, @mommyjd put it best:

This show sounded better on paper

.

So what happened and what was it that turned off so many, especially the 30 or so in the chat last night, admittedly a small sample?

harlem-heights
Harlem Heights

Quite simply, it wasn’t entertaining. If you’ve ever gone out to a spot, waited in line, paid for an expensive drink, and gotten bored from just people watching and seeing the same old faces, you’ve essentially grasped Harlem Heights. While it may seem underhanded, I do want to give props to the extended family whom I personally know and support for their work and professional package. Unfortunately, the two episodes that debuted last night felt like just that: packaging.

As I scanned the Twitterverse and watched our chat participants, the theme of over-editing and scripted dialogue kept popping up. The images were positive, the vibe was classy, but it didn’t feel genuine. Perhaps it was the Baldwin Hills voiceover or the lack of vested interest in the characters, but contrary to my interview the other day with the Harlem Heights story producer, maybe the show wasn’t intended for me.

While it may be the result of unreal expectation, entertainment wise, Harlem Heights is not The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air nor does it have the replay value of The Cosby Show. Our targeted demographic probably has that point of reference in mind, and the rehashed reality show reputation of BET juxtaposed to images of 106 and Park and BET Uncut, gave cynicism its rightful place at the front row.

So what would make it better?

I’m not sure. I mentioned last night that it probably just needs to scrap the reality formula and make it fully scripted. Add some crazy plot twists, some possible ‘Office-esque’ comedy (I feel like I’m describing the Game), and I think YBP’s will gravitate towards the escape of seeing themselves in unlikely situations, instead of just….watching their peers play themselves…in boring, day-to-day life.

I remember when I was living in London and caught glimpses of the atrocity that is Flavor of Love via the FB status messages of my friends. For some strange reason, I wished “they” would make a better reality show, namely about “us”. Why? I don’t know, namely because I don’t like watching reality t.v., unless its a subsidiary of the Discovery channel. Well, “they” have. “They” is B.E.T. and “it” is called Harlem Heights.

Harlem Heights

Harlem Heights

Dubbed as insight to the young, black, and fabulous crowd, the setting is in Harlem, New York and follows real friends through their professional and social ups and downs. Of particular interest is Brooke Crittendon, Kanyé West’s ex-fiancée. Feeling like she needed to lend a voice to her experience as ‘the other half to a famous person’, B.E.T. president Loretha Jones assures us that Harlem Heights is not The Hills.

From the N.Y. Daily News:

The cast includes a lifestyle editor for the basketball publication Dime magazine, an aspiring actress, a fashionista, a young man contemplating a career in politics and even a young dad. It’s a group of friends moving out of college and into the working world.

“This show isn’t ‘The Hills,’ ” said BET president Loretha Jones. “The cast was friends before, so their relationships are natural and they allowed us to follow them in such a way that they were unconcerned with the cameras being there, and let us capture the real interactions.”

Jones also said that unlike some other reality shows about twentysomethings, “Harlem Heights” would explore not only emotional drama, but also professional drama and the excitement and celebrations of last year’s historical election night.

So what say you? “They” finally might make a reality show profiling “us”. Are you going to watch?

…and intelligent, pertinent questions are asked. Color me shocked and surprise. I was halfway expecting ‘What do you listen to on your iPod’ and ‘Have you heard the new Common joint’.

Lol.

Video below:

[H/T to Soulbounce.com]

Shouts to Intelligent Ignorance.

Interestingly enough, the question of ‘artistic merit’ is stretched pretty far by McGruder in this episode. While Brandon over at Intelligent Ignorance posed the question of ‘is this more hurtful, than helpful’, I’m reminded of the lessons in history class about the merits of artists that challenged their time, ultimately inventing their own style. At given points in history, Van Gogh and Degas challenged the status quo through their expressions and were often relegated as ‘hacks’ or ‘inciting chaos’. While our times have definitely evolved and McGruder may never be in the same conversation as those artistic legends (except in this post), the principle, to me, is the same.

Art, whether comedy, cartoon, film, theatre, or music, has always had the special distinction of exciting our senses. It makes us laugh and cry, it stimulates our inner critic, and it causes a reaction. Of most importance, it fosters discussion. Art is in imitation of life, and whether your life reflects that piece of art is entirely subjective. The Boondocks is so powerful and polarizing because it does all of those things in a nice-and-neat, shell-shaded package.

Updated: Episode 2 is here.

[video below]

© Copyright Black Web Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.