Quantcast George Bush « Young Black Professional Guide

Posts Tagged ‘George Bush’

by Demetrius Walker

I voted for Barack Obama but I am not a Democrat. Before you get your hopes up Michael Steele, let me say that I also do not agree with the Republican party platform. So if I don’t fit into either of those two injudicious boxes, where do I fall you ask? Well, I side with the greatest mind of the 20th century, Albert Einstein, in feeling that “we shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive.” Call me a radical. Call me a dreamer. Call me whatever derogatory political name you can think of as long as you also call me a Socialtarian.

I know what you’re thinking now – what the heck is a Socialtarian? The truth is, I made up the term after realizing I equally subscribe to Socialism and many Libertarian ideals. Before you capitalist pigs and liberal lilies accuse me of being oxymoronic, take a second to think outside the box for once. Actually, to make things easier for you, let’s start inside your boxes.

Campaign Cover...
Creative Commons License credit: MotherPie
Socialtarian: Neither Democrat or Republican

First, Republicans, you guys supposedly stand for small government, fiscal responsibility, high moral standards, and deregulation of the economy. Under the Bush Administration, the federal government ballooned and became a more pervasive presence in the everyday life of Americans. “Freedom and liberty” was extended to Iraq, while I lost the right to have an untapped phone conversation at home. Even more, we squandered a couple trillion dollars in our attempt to “liberate” Iraq and “organize” Afghanistan. As far as moral standards are concerned, I’ve lost track of how many Republican public officials were tied up in corruption, sex, and crime scandals in the past few years (to be fair, I can say the same for Democrats, but this is not a cornerstone of their platform).

Those Republicans I find most intriguing are the purportedly “Conservative” members of the party. Basing your belief system on “Christian” standards, you paradoxically subscribe to inequality, intolerance, and greed. I remember debating with many of you when Joe The Plumber exposed Barack Obama’s tax plan as “socialist.” You guys threw a temper tantrum and completely lost your bearings! The very same Republicans that argued that the foundations of American law should be more reflective of the Bible, were the same people that acknowledged that there should be no spreading of the wealth; there should be no universal healthcare; their tax dollars should not fund the rebuilding of better schools in neighborhoods they don’t live in. Well why don’t we check what the Bible says? Turn to 1 Corinthians 12:24-26. Are you ready?

“… God has combined the members of the body and has given greater honor to the parts that lacked it, [25] so that there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. [26] If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it.”

Don’t get me started on the countless other verses I could quote that undoubtedly prove the Bible is actually a socialistic doctrine. So how can you “evangelical/morally conservative” Republicans sleep in peace knowing that you actually do not wish to see social equality? I’ve never understood how you could wholeheartedly agree with the Bible, yet refuse to subscribe to the belief that at least some portion of the country’s wealth should be divided to eliminate poverty, grant universal healthcare, and promote a better education system for children in ALL communities. It baffles me how you can quote Jesus in one breath and then tell me you don’t care about the greater welfare of your fellow citizens in the next breath. I’ve even had conversations with many of you that seem to believe poor people are only poor because they chose not to work hard; you are completely ignorant to the socio economic factors that facilitate the perpetual cycle of poverty in the US and abroad. The main factor is your GREED; your unwillingness to share for the greater benefit of the entire group. Only after starting out with an equal chance at success, would it be fair to acknowledge that a person’s ultimate failures or triumphs were completely self induced.

On to the Democrats. You guys don’t seem to have as much of a problem tossing money around. You also claim to be proponents of equal rights. But tossing money around willy nilly, and promoting a class of citizens dependent upon degrading welfare systems is not what I envision as conducive to a greater America. Don’t give hungry people a fish and tell them to eat merrily; teach the people to fish so that they may feed themselves and others! This starts with education. Don’t blow our tax dollars on public housing facilities and benefit programs for lazy, uneducated people that will only pass down more ignorance to their offspring. Create a universal standard for public education and public school facilities starting at Kindergarten. Bailout our failing education system, not the corporations that will continue to erode our ethics, and deplete our financial resources.

In the area of equal rights, Democrats are all talk. Look at the issue of gay marriage for example. Whatever your religious affiliation, there is nothing in the Constitution that denies gay people the fundamental right to marry. Yet, many top Democrats, including our 44th President, stand firmly in ignorance with the Right Wing when it comes to preventing gays from marriage. I am a Christian, I go to Bible Study every Wednesday and church every Sunday. But even I can see that the doctrine which governs the United States is the Constitution, not the Bible. Why should I care whether two men or two women want to marry each other anyway? As a straight male, this does not make dating more competitive for me. It actually makes it easier, as those lesbians I might have hit on can more easily display that they’re off limits. Are most Americans worried that the country will become somehow gayer if we allow homosexuals to marry? Do you think that if we prevent them from marrying that they’ll eventually go away? This is ludicrous!

This brings me to why I consider myself a Socialtarian. I side with the Bible in believing that it is our job to collectively support one another. I also believe in the inalienable rights of man – Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Anything that prevents these principles from manifesting is unjust and wasteful. In our current state, capitalism unfairly lumps a large chunk of wealth into the hands of a tiny segment of our population. This fosters the poverty, crime, and desperation that generates 90 percent of the world’s problems. In the words of Einstein,

“the economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil. We see before us a huge community of producers, the members of which are unceasingly striving to deprive each other of the fruits of their collective labor — not by force, but on the whole in faithful compliance with legally established rules (Why Socialism by Albert Einstein).”

If we were to distribute the country’s finances in a socialistic manner that specifically focused on the promotion of equal education, then poverty, crime, and other socioeconomic factors would cease to exist.

This where I draw the line. I do not wish to see a federal government that confiscates every dollar earned, nor one that strives to eliminate a difference in income between dish washers and brain surgeons. I merely wish to see the United States become a place where every child is born with a perfectly equal shot at success and the attainment of wealth. Every man is guaranteed life, which correlates to the preservation of existence, a right only secured through universal healthcare. Each man is also ensured liberty in this country. Therefore, I side with the Libertarian party’s call “for a world in which all individuals can freely exercise the natural right of sole dominion over their own lives.” Outside of making sure every citizen starts on equal ground, I do not need the federal or state government to be my third parent. For example, I should not be subject to incarceration for using drugs. If a person wants to damage their own body and it doesn’t affect others then let them be. If crack was legal, would you go out and smoke some today? I highly doubt it, so why the need for such foolish laws? All I demand the government to do is collect funds and apply them directly to the elimination of poverty, education and health disparities so that I may pursue my happiness… then get the hell out of the way. So take note you foxes and wolves, a ferocious beast is on the prowl for you – the Socialtarian.

by Justin Giboney

Make an objective appraisal of the following statistics because they form the basis of an inconvenient truth that I would like black America to consider:

  • A study conducted by criminologists at Northeastern University found that since 2000, while overall murder rates nationwide have fallen, the murder rate among black youth is on the rise.
  • Homicide is the leading cause of death for black males between the ages of 15 and 29.
  • 94% of blacks murdered are murdered by other blacks.
  • According to the Associated Press, in 2008, more citizens were murdered in Chicago (city with one of the highest black population in America) than American soldiers killed in Iraq.

While external threats to a nation are always a serious concern, more often than not, internal threats present a more immediate and grave danger (see War on Terror). What’s more, sabotage within cripples a people’s ability to fight without. For some time, I have struggled with whether or not many of the more problematic issues in the black community are a microcosm of that same science. Is it possible that at this moment in history, black America’s most mortal enemy is within?

The Tuskegee Experiment
The Tuskegee Experiment

From the Tuskegee Experiment to Cointelpro, black America’s had good reason to be suspicious of the intent and effect of external forces. To suggest such indignities should simply be forgotten is neither useful nor realistic.  In the same breath, these wrongs should not and cannot be used as an eternal crutch. Unfortunately, the vestiges of such cruelness still haunt the psyches of many African-Americans and render us hyper-cynical and prone to entertaining the most far out conspiracy theories. Cynicism can warp reality.

The barbershop has long served as a daily forum for male discourse. There is no better place to gauge the black male sentiment on a variety of topics.  However, you will quickly find that these conversations often unveil a deep-seated cynicism. Enter any black barbershop from Tuesday through Saturday and you are guaranteed to hear spirited debates, along with a few outlandish conspiracy theories.  You might even hear a story about how the American government is using iPods and ESPN to exterminate the black community.  I have heard theories that are so creative, they make a Dan Brown novel seem pedestrian.  It is entertaining at times, but disheartening once you realize that some of us actually use such theories to shun responsibility and feed a sense of helplessness and defeatism.

Notwithstanding the atrocities of the past or the inequities of the present, self-responsibility must kick in at some point. As incompetent and irresponsible as the W. Bush administration may have seemed, they were not the cause of all the black community’s problems.  Violent crime is one of the most pressing concerns in the black community and we would be sadly remiss if we failed to take the majority of the responsibility in this issue.

BE047455
Creative Commons License credit: seccad
Are We Too Apologetic?

For every Sean Bell and Oscar Grant (R.I.P.), there are several hundred blacks killed at the hands of other blacks (not in uniform). Where is the outrage and protest? Our youth are being intimidated and  corrupted and our elderly are afraid to step out their doors. Why do we make excuses for the individuals who terrorize our community on a daily basis? Perhaps it is because they are our sons, brothers, nephews, and cousins.  We must fight the denial that prevents us from seeing the blood dripping from our collective hand.

Most apologists suggest these perpetrators are somehow absolved because of historical mistreatment and poor backgrounds. In my opinion, those factors do not justify terrorizing your community. A significant number of  blacks have always suffered from relatively low socio-economic statuses; however, poor living conditions have never been an excuse for such poor behavior. Moreover, there are several third world countries with significantly lower murder rates, so poverty in itself cannot be a justification.

These apologists also work off the misconception that the great majority of the young brothers committing these crimes are poverty stricken. On the contrary, I venture to say that a good number of these brothers did not grow up like Jermaine and Dukie in The Wire. There is a pervasive thug and anti-intellectualism mentality in our community that transcends economic lines further than we would like to admit.

Take an honest assessment of the violence plaguing the black community.  Can we honestly contend that it does not stem from internal sources?  Can we in good faith pawn yet another community issue off on “The Man”?  Undoubtedly, we can put a dent in the senseless violence in our community, but the first step is acknowledging the enemy within.

As a child do you remember your mom telling you not to run through the house with scissors in your hand? The reason she said that is because she knew that even with all of your good intentions you’d stop paying attention and end up looking like Slick Rick, less the gold teeth and fedora. For the many that made it to adulthood without losing an eye or an appendage, we’re all grateful to mom for the oversight.

The similarities between the performance of the last half decade of our economy and the indiscretions of an innocent child are eerily similar. This era has been one of gross negligence, greed, and down right stupidity. There is absolutely no question that the system is broken, but the $850 Billion question is who broke it? I’d love to stick the blame to George Bush, Hank Paulson, hell even OJ, but none of them alone are the true culprit. The economic issues that exist today don’t belong exclusively to Main Street or Wall Street…we did this to we.

Running With Scissors
Creative Commons License credit: thorinside
Are You Running w/ Scissors?

Remember when the housing market was hot, when you could get a home loan for $5 down and a smile?
Remember you could take the world’s worst credit into a luxury car dealership and drive away in a $50,000 gas-guzzler with no payments for 90 days?
Remember when the requirements to get a credit card were a pulse and pen?

As consumers we reveled in these times and used the easy credit to enrich our lifestyles beyond belief. Where in the universe did any of these transactions make good economic sense? We discounted the fact that the day would come when we had to pay the piper.

In addition to living like Diddy on a $45,000 a year salary, we also pushed and pushed to make sure our investments were as prosperous as we were. We celebrated the sexy earners on Wall Street and clamored to get a part of their financial windfalls without asking how. If a company wasn’t performing as well as its peers, then there was a problem. Oust the existing CEO and get a real earner in there.

CEO’s got rich, 401K’s got fat, and home values got higher than KC and Jo Jo at a Columbian Cocoa convention.

Through it all we never asked ourselves how or why is this right. We just took it and ran.
I once had an economics professor who asked the same questions on every one of his tests. The question was:

What does Caveat Emptor mean and why is it important?

For those who don’t know, it is the Latin translation for Buyer Beware. It seems like a simple enough question to answer on a test, but it’s more difficult to apply to life. Today I realize why that question was so important. Of the two parties involved in a transaction, the buyer has to be better, more educated, and the more rational risk taker. If he is not, he’ll lose it all on one turn of pitch-and-toss. Sure, human nature, the sales pitch and our love of vanity/riches, make us as American’s drunk on the possibility of the one hit wonder, but one hit wonders fade quickly.

Wall Street Bull
Creative Commons License credit: PittCaleb
We were All Bullish

If Wall Street and Main Street had been aware, maybe we would not have witnessed 650,000 properties being foreclosed on in the first quarter of 2008. Maybe financial icons like Lehman Brothers and Morgan Stanley would still be around. Maybe your neighbor would still have the title to his home.

I wish my mom had been there to tell my neighbor and the CEO of AIG to stop running with scissors in hand. I know, hindsight is 20/20 and now we’ve got to focus on how to get out of this mess, but if past performance is indicative of future results, we’ll be dealing with this mess for another 45-50 years. I just hope that we’re all able to make better decisions.

Caveat Emptor Forever

As always, for more info check us out at www.molifeney.com.

Indy Mac, WaMu, Wachovia — bank failures are on the rise. The credit and liquidity of the U.S. economy is bone dry. The $700 billion bailout plan was defeated by House of Representatives on Monday.
I don’t know about you, but I’m starting to believe the end of the world is nearing. Oh my! History is frighteningly repeating himself while many media outlets are focused on pig lipstick and hoping to hear Gov. Palin mispronounce Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (LOL).

Seriously, in the late 1920s and 1930s bank failures were a common occurrence as desperate bankers called in loans which the borrowers did not have time or money to repay. The Great Depression was caused, as many economists agree, by debt. After the panic of 1929, and during the first 10 months of 1930, 744 U.S. banks failed. (Over 9,000 banks failed during the 1930s). Sound familiar? Today, banks are dying in a way we could not have imagined. More than ever, let us all be wise on the status of our current personal cash flow.

Great Depression by izeemoretti=)
Blacks in the Great Depression

What is so intriguing is the root cause of what’s happening today. The Federal Reserve Bank System, a private corporation that produces currency for the entire nation, is why we are in this potential Depression. The Federal Reserve Bank System controls interest rates and the money supply (inflation). They regulate the value of currency. They loan the government money with interest. It is theorized that your taxes pay back this interest and not necessarily socialized programs. Every dollar loaned has immediate debt; therefore, debt becomes inevitable. To pay the debt, new money has to be created. It’s an ongoing cycle of debt. All of this is deeper than the subprime mortgage crisis. All of this is crashing in front of our eyes.

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago by SK Photography
Federal Reserve Bank in Chicago

According to some and in basic terms, your money (dollar currency) may soon be replaced by the amero. Besides the Lou Dobbs show, you may not hear too much about the amero and the North American Currency Union. The North American Currency Union is a theorized economic and monetary union of the three principal countries of North America: Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. The union would insist all three countries giving up their current currency units (Canadian dollar, U.S. dollar, and Mexican pesos) and adopting a new one. The unnoticed, unregulated agreement was sign by Pres. George W. Bush without congressional approval. Conspiracy theorists contend that the governments of the United States, Canada, and Mexico are already taking steps to implement such a currency.

Amero Coins by AMERO
Amero Coins

All of this stems from how the Federal Reserve Bank System was founded (at a time when banks were being closed). There is a documentary outlining the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank that you must watch to get a feel for what is REALLY going on. One world-one economy. This Michael Moore-esque film is mind blowing as it touches on the U.S. banking system, wars, Prescott Bush, 9/11/01, the New World Order and how they all may relate.

This isn’t Cracker Barrel going out of business y’all. This is serious. Things are happening just too fast.

What are your thoughts on the documentary?
How does this affect your current view of the U.S. Federal Government and our economic woes?

Interesting email I received from one my colleagues. His logic is interesting, and considering the debacle our President has gotten us in over the last 8 years, I wouldn’t be surprised if the brilliant minds of Wall Street actually set themselves up with a safety net in the form of insured credit default assets in an effort to leverage something they knew would fail.

OK, so I’ve been turning this all around in my head for a while, and here’s my conspiracy theory for the wall street mess.

Ever since Bush came to power, the finance sector has known that no one is watching, so they are free to rob the country blind. They moved massive amounts of money from poor to middle class people’s hands into the huge investment banks by selling mortages to people who can’t afford them. They then took that and other real money and started making a market for funny money — trading ever crazier financial instruments, and adding more and more layers of speculation (ie, Credit Default Swaps — insurance on these securities should they go bad), while all the while pocketing huge fees on all these transactions. Lots of rich people got richer, their pockets are where the real money disappeared to, impoverishing the nation.

Washington mira a la Bolsa
Creative Commons License credit: Mossaiq
A conspiracy inside Wall Street?

The gov’t purposefully didn’t regulate the CDSs, #1 because Bush defunded the SEC as a matter of course, and #2 because they are useful to cause a panic that only the feds giving money to wall street can fix. Great info on CDS.

The instant that Wall Street realized that Obama was going to win (when the Palin bounce dissipated), and knew that the ‘make real money off of funny money’ game was going to end, they allowed the securities to tank all at once, knowing that the 62 trillion in CDSs would cause a financial panic if people tried to collect, since there’s probably not that much money on the planet. That way, they can count on their buddies the Bushes to just give them a huge lump sum right before leaving office, instead of the many hundreds of billions that they would’ve made on funny money had McCain been president.

Hence, Bush and his appointees are pushing the bailout just like the Patriot Act: This is an (easily preventable) emergency (that we knew was coming)! Give my friends all this money right now with no oversight or we’ll have a Great Depression (we won’t)!!! Notice how they had this all ready to roll right when the emergency hit, just like with the Patriot Act. They knew something like this was going to happen, and they wanted it to go *exactly* their way when it did. It’s good for hedge fund managers and investment banks because they get free money. It’s good for Bush and the neocons because the next president will have an even *bigger* hole to dig themselves out of before they can actually do anything once elected — another 700 billion that can’t be used to actually fix any problems. Obama will be hamstrung before he even takes office, just like Clinton was.

Our only defense is Congress, who has not once stood up for the people when in this situation.

– Justin.

My overall, question, however, is if the root cause of this issue lies in people not paying their mortgages, why wouldn’t the bail out provide a type of bond or restricted bill that gives the American people a way to take the money and only use it to pay a mortgage on one house that they own? I mean, if mortgage securities are banking on people paying their mortgages, help people pay them as part of the $700 billion dollar pie!

© Copyright Black Web Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.