Quantcast Politics « Young Black Professional Guide

Posts Tagged ‘Politics’

Desiree Rogers

Desiree Rogers

Name: Desiree Rogers
New Job: White House Social Secretary

Super power: Party! Party! Party! Rogers is super social butterfly, big on the socialite scene in Chicago with her business connections and ability to have a good time

Obama Connection: Michelle Obama
From The Washington Post:

Rogers, 49, is a friend of Michelle and President-elect Barack Obama’s, and a leader in Chicago corporate and civic circles; her appointment signals that the first couple consider the job crucial to how they introduce themselves to the country and the globe. She was a major fundraiser for Obama.

Claim to fame: Rogers was most recently with Allstate Financial, where she was “creating a social network of clients and consumers.” She was also once president of Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas.
From the Chicago Tribune:

Rogers, who studied at Wellesley College and later earned an MBA from Harvard, was once married to Chicagoan John Rogers, Ariel Capital Management chief and another close Obama friend and fundraiser. Her first highly visible post was in state government. She managed the lottery for then-governor Jim Edgar in the ’90s, appearing on TV giving away pots of money.

Why she’s fabulous: According to Obama friend Valerie Jarrett — “This appointment sends a strong me message that the Obamas want to use the White House strategically, to maximize its use in a way that is consistent with their philosophy — [to] open it to a broader range of people, ” said Valerie Jarrett, an Obama intimate and friend of Rogers’s who also will work in the White House. “Desirée is a heavy hitter — she comes with her own range of contacts from around the country. She’s close to Michelle and she knows everyone who will be working in the West Wing, so she will be able to create a synergy.”

 alt=

Valerie Jarrett

Name: Valerie Jarrett
New Job:
White House Senior Adviser

Super power: Tenacious Charm and Outward Brilliance. She also managed to smooth things over with Clinton supporters, bringing them under the fold after the contentious primary race and she works as Obama’s outreach to leaders within the black community.

Obama Connection: She’s a close and personal friend/mentor of Michelle, then later Barack
From The New York Times:

“I can count on someone like Valerie to take my hand and say, You need to think about these three things,” Mrs. Obama said. “Like a mom, a big sister, I trust her implicitly.”

Claim to fame: “A protégée of Mayor Richard M. Daley

Why she’s fabulous: While new to Washington she’s ready to hit the ground running in an effort to avoid the pratfalls that hindered hometown heroes like herself from making it in the Capitol. She’s tiny, but mighty, mighty powerful, in spite of being “underestimated” due to her ethnicity, gender, height, pixie haircut, being the only black woman in the boardroom and the fact that she’s very “girlish” with a “singsong voice and suits that earned her a recent profile in Vogue.” (NYT)

Susan Rice

Susan Rice

Name: Susan Rice
Potential Role: Ambassador to the United Nations

Super power: Anti-Genocide Warrior. From the International Herald Tribune:

The choice of Rice to represent t he United States before the United Nations will make her one of the most visible faces of the Obama administration to the outside world aside from Clinton. It will also send to the world organization a prominent and forceful advocate of stronger action, including military force if necessary, to stop mass killings like those in the Darfur region of Sudan in recent years.

Obama Connection: She’s a warrior. She needed no such connections! Actually, she’s a former Clintonite who switched sides.

Claim to fame: She’s considered brilliant and tough. Writes the International Herald Tribune:

If confirmed, Rice at 44 would be the second-youngest ambassador to the United Nations. A Rhodes scholar who earned a doctorate in international relations at Oxford University, she joined Bill Clinton’s National Security Council staff in 1993 before rising to assistant secretary of state for African affairs at age 32. When Obama decided to run for president, she signed up as one of his top advisers, much to the consternation of the Clinton camp, which resented what it saw as a defection. Some colleagues from her Clinton and Obama days said Rice can be blunt and unafraid to “mix it up,” as one put it, on behalf of issues she cares about. Rice herself acknowledges a certain impatience at times. Admirers said she is a good listener and able to stand up to strong personalities, including foreign autocrats and militants in volatile regions of the world. “Susan certainly is toug h, and she’s tough in exactly the right way,” said Strobe Talbott, a former deputy secretary of state and now president of the Brookings Institution, where Rice has worked in recent years. “She’s intellectually tough, she’s tough in her approach to how the policymaking process should work and she will be very effective as a diplomat.”

Why she’s fabulous: Goodness, she wants to stop genocide in Darfur in the Sudan. That makes her fabulous enough. Good luck to her on that. She’s also not John Bolton, Bush’s former recess appointment as Ambassador to the UN. Bolton, like much of Bush and Co., didn’t believe in the purpose of the UN or giving it any power — real or perceived. Therefore they sent a man to work at frustrating and undermining the organization our country help found and headquarters. (He’s already bitching over Obama elevating the ambassadorship back to a cabinet level20position as it was under President Bill Clinton.) Under the long list of reasons why the world hates us, you will find John Bolton’s name. Rice is going to get a standing ovation just for not being him.

Part 1 can be found here.

Fredric: Interesting points.

First, I’ll go ahead and relent that your particular political knowledge of ‘what did he vote for, what did he not vote for’, especially in Illinois, is a lot more tight than mine. While I understand the questions around ‘why would he take a neutral ground on an important issue’, I guess my default response is to say ‘what were the circumstances?’

Just Hatin’To simply label a vote on an issue as a barometer for one’s moral compass or mindset, I think, is completely unfair. I know, from personal experience, that things tend to be more than they appear. Let’s take the issue you brought up about ‘not voting for the war, but voting to fund the war’. Politics has always been a ‘if you scratch my back, I will scratch yours’. All politicians play the game that if they think a bill or issue that is really popular will go through the voting parties, they’ll try and tack on little bits and pieces here and there to make sure their personal interests are met. What was vexing about the war funding bill is the question of ‘well, I didnt vote for the war, but since we are in it, does that mean that I shouldnt vote for the kids that are over there to have the equipment they need to protect themselves?’ One critic may say, ‘well Barack, you didnt hold true to your principles. If you were so against it, why would you vote to fund it?’ To me, I think him being able to weigh each issues separately and not with the blindfolds of ‘well, Im sticking to my guns and I will vote down anything related to the war’ tells me that he has a better sense of what is going on and has an astute vision on this controversial issue.

These qualities are something that uniquely define leaders. It is very easy for one to be part of the ‘yay’ or ‘nay’ crowd, but to moderate the discussion, to blaze a path to the solution so that parties at least come to the table with something that works AND something that satisfies sometimes takes a neutral mindset every now and then.

Like I said, the specifics of his voting record in Illinois, I mean….I dont have an answer for. I do know that Illinois politics is a rough game, and that was obvious from the stupid-ass crap they were pulling with funding for the CTA this past year! I mean, it would seem a no-brainer to give more funds, but cats were stagnating on the issue because they kept trying to add their little piece into the bill.

As for the whole ‘well, when he gets elected, then all the white hoodies will come out and trap that negro’, I mean….what do you want me to say to that? I’ve always been of the mindset that true virtues trump conniving ways. He is a smart guy and I don’t underestimate that he will take each challenge one step at a time while putting the people around him to make sure he’s ok. Even more so, he has Michelle. A good friend once told me that 95% of success is marrying the right person. It may seem ‘fluffy’ to discount his approach and her thoughts on how they view themselves and the importance of their family, but it speaks volumes about their character. Since no one can predict tomorrow, my gut tells me to support someone who I believe can make the best decision when tomorrow comes.

Let’s put it this way….the CEO of a company is never the smartest person, the most frugal, the most endearing, or the most business savvy. The CEO, especially the successful ones, are the ones who are the most visionary. While it can be said that he may not know the political games as well as <insert 20+ year senator here> or know THE answer to end all debts, poverty, healthcare, war, and faults in education, he does have the capacity to envision a solution with the pieces he will be given.

As for his specific platform, if you need a specific link:
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/

Tahani: In regards to the Iraq war, the voting against funding would be a blatant show of distrust in the policies and adamantly sticking to your guns. Regardless of which way Barack voted, Bush would get his funding by flexing some executive muscle that most presidents haven’t in many generations of leadership. A lot of citizens didn’t know that regardless of how the senate, etc. votes, the President can veto whatever he wants which Bush has recently. Had Barack REALLY been in disagreement with the war and its policies, he would have used his vote to take a firm stand. He chose not to, and continues to lie to us time and time again.

I love Michelle Obama in that she’s a real black woman like myself. She’s dark and intelligent, and her nationality and smarts aren’t a question in peoples’ minds. I respect and admire their union, but the reality of the situation is that they both need to start planning. There are specifics related to this election that Barack can’t answer in debates or interviews. He falls back on that “I didn’t vote for the war, and Bill’s blemished presidency” excuse too often for me. I can’t stand it because I feel bad just voting on a “hope that he’ll get it together and not mess up”. As more affluent young African-American’s, we are all kinda voting based on feelings and and what we hope will happen. We know better than to take things for its surface value. We are used to research and thinking! We must do more than just feel that being ambitious and speaking like Dr. King is good enough to become President! Why don’t we ask the tough question’s? Why aren’t we more concerned about our credit rating or our futures? Maybe isn’t good enough for me, and I hope (there’s his favorite word again) that once he gets into the oval office, he’ll think and plan like he should be doing now. Hillary is thinking now. Barack might get it together, later… that scares me a lil’ bit.

I’ll check out those sites, but if you had some links of him answereing specific question’s, that would be dope. Anyone can type some ish up on his site, and more often than not, its not Barack, since he’s so busy. I can’t find any interviews, etc. where he answers with more than a cliché slogan, and thats what i’m searching for.

Now, I wouldn’t judge Barack on his voting being directly tied to his moral composition if he didn’t constantly put that out there. “You know my intentions are genuine by my voting record. I urge all the doubters that question my experience to look at my track record.” Well, when I did just that, I saw that a lot of the things he says are lies. I can attach this to his inexperience, but Hillary knows the game. She votes firmly and sticks to what she believes in. You can’t question certain things because her intentions are air tight, which attracts me, but similarly makes me a bit cautious of what’s going on underneath the tight front.

Now, about blazing a neutral path…Vote against mean laws and rewrite it in a way that makes the law more appropriate. Vote for laws that will protect us. Regarding his votes on these laws, he said “I didn’t agree with a legal provision.” Hillary asked him ‘well why didn’t you vote it down and join a committee to rewrite it?’ He replied, “there are many things that go into voting in Il. I can’t waste time explaining every single vote, there is another candidate here. We should include him in this debate also.” COPPED OUT. Then, Edwards asserted the same question and to it Barack replied, “you keep picking out certain things to attack me on and I won’t argue over these small votes in the IL senate.” You can see these complete debates on youtube.com. Just search for Jan 22, 2008 debates. If you’re this pillar of moral blah blah, don’t befriend and protect slum lords, don’t ignore laws that will protect victims, credit reports, etc. Everything I read about Barack is kinda see-through. It’s nothing that I couldn’t say. I want him to have some deep thoughts that I didn’t think of. I also want him to know what he believes enough to say it in a debate and not go back to the whole catchphrase shuck and jive monkey shows he’s too comfortable performing in.

Thoughts readers?

Updated: Part 3.

(Reprinted and edited with the permission of Tahani Tompkins)

Barack ObamaTahani: What should I make of the whole “present” voting thing? Also why does Barack keep saying he didn’t vote for the war? It’s true that in 2002 he wasn’t in a position to vote for or against the war, right? Lastly, where can i go to see his plans for the future. My main issue is that when he’s asked something in a debate/interview, he always reverts back to that handy “I didn’t vote for the Iraq war”, or he says something like “I represent change, lets look to the future not the past.” These responses don’t answer the question, but I’m sure he has to have a plan in place right?

Fredric: Well, the notion that his view and take on things aren’t accessible is fallible. You can check cnn.com for all of the candidates’ views on all of the major issues. Although it could be viewed as biased, he also has a list on his website. As for the war, Barack has to play the game to win. Politics is always about ‘what i did when’ and ‘what ive done then’ to solidify what one ‘would’ do. If anything, the politicians no that the war strikes a chord with voters, so he has to play that card, just like Hillary has to play the “this is what I’ve done, and here is my experience” every two secs.

Not sure what you mean by ‘present’ voting. If you mean the new found inspirational vote he garners from young voters and new voters, I mean, what can you really say to that? For the last 8 years, we’ve been through 9/11, Enron, a war spending trillions, recession, devastating natural disasters (Katrina, Cali fires) and just unspeakable gun-related crimes (i.e., va tech). While you can’t blame the President, you definitely look at these events as an opportunity for leadership. We’re basically seeing a visible swing in culture where the image of white men now project fears of distrust, stupidity, and control. Barack is simply trying to strike a ‘hope’ chord with everyone by using that as his platform. In addition, he’s backing it with a solid plan based on technological innovation and good ol’ midwestern values. Since our generation is so ‘tech savvy’, it makes sense that he garners a lot of this demographic.

Tahani: LOL. Now Fred, I’m going to need you to follow politics like I thought you did. When certain bills arose in the IL senate Barack didn’t vote yes or no, he voted “present” which is like I was there, but I’m not going to say yes or no to the issue. He did this OVER 130 times. Some of the bills he voted present on are

  1. Interest rate caps for credit card companies.,
  2. Disclosure limitations for victims of sex crimes. Alexis Cossey just stole my identity and I for one am not too keen on these credit card companies being able to charge whatever rate they choose on credit cards that I DID NOT ORDER.
  3. Further more, I work with at risk young ladies. There are men that prey via the internet based on too much information being available publicly. They seek out previous victims and with Barack’s vote, they’d be able to continue to find out who’s a victim in their area and continue to re-victimize them. There are a myriad of other serious issues he voted “present” on. You should look them up.

Now in IL legislature, present voting is a common practice and seen as similar to a “no”. However, if Barack is sooooooo firm on his principals and such a stand up guy, why not vote with a firm yes or no. Why wouldn’t he vote to protect his TWO DAUGHTERS safety? If he is all about young people, does he not recognize how credit card companies prey on college students? Why not vote to protect their credit files?

Now, regarding this war. Barack saying he didn’t vote for the war is as meaningful as me saying I didn’t vote for the war. He wasn’t in a place in his political career to vote against the war just like I wasn’t. He keeps touting that around like he stood up against the war when the FACT is he voted FOR FUNDING, not against it. Politicians that opposed the war voted against funding and stood by their opposition. Barack did not do that. I’m not biased or trying to prove a point, I’m presenting you with FACTS.

I was the biggest Barack supporter there was until I started to do my research into who he really is. He kept millions of dollars donated by Rezko and even bought a house from him. He had a PERSONAL relationship with a slum lord that raped residents on the south side of Chicago. I’m disturbed by that relationship. It bothers me to know that he won’t answer and question’s regarding why only 40K instead of the 3 million dollars of Rezko related funds were donated.

What is his solid plan? I keep looking for it and asking and no one is telling in detail. On v103, he said “I’ll use government funds for healthcare reform.” Well duh, we figured that, but which government funds? When the host asked him that, he replied “There are funds available that have not been used and I will see to it that we use them for healthcare.” Now Fred, you’re an intelligent guy, could you not have said that? My 9 year old sister could say “I’m going to use government funds to do goverment stuff.” I’m tired of Barack slinging slogans and giving blank answers or refusing to answer certain questions. I’m going to vote for him because he’s the first Black man that actually has a chance and I’d like to see him there, but that doesn’t change the fact that he’s blatantly avoiding real issues. He needs to come with real answers and plans or else they’ll make a mockery of him. Did you pay attention to how REPUBLICANS pushed for Barack to run, initially, years ago? Why? So that when their prewritten policies come into fruition, it’ll look like Barack wasn’t prepared enough and it’ll ensure another “nigger” doesn’t step outside his place. Do the math, the FACTS are out there. You just have to find them.

Part II is here. Part III is here.

Please add your thoughts below!

© Copyright Black Web Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.